Homework 2

Irrelevant Instruments

You need to type and email me your answers.

  1. (Due 2/12) Consider the following regression
    MATH
    $t=1,...,T$, where $x_{t}=1,$ $\beta $ is an unknown parameter and $e_{t\text{ }}$are MATH. It is proposed to estimate $\beta $ by instrumental variable (IV) methods using a $l\times 1$ vector of instruments $x_{t}$ generated by
    MATH
    Let MATH be the IV estimator of $\beta $ obtained with the instruments $x_{t}.$

    1. Show that $z_{t}$ satisfies
      MATH
      and
      MATH
      and interpret them.

      Easy.

    2. Find the limit distribution of the vector
      MATH
      and prove your result.

      Under the assumptions about $e_{t}$ and $z_{t},$ this vector will be asymptotically normal. Then by a CLT (say for a martingale difference sequence, MDS)
      MATH
      and
      MATH
      Finally, consider the joint distribution of two elements in the $2\times 1$ vector. Any linear combination of these elements takes the form
      MATH
      Then MATH is also a MDS with positive variance given by
      MATH
      satisfying
      MATH
      for MATH and
      MATH
      Thus any linear combination of the two elements in the vector is asymptotically normal, implying a limiting bivariate normal distribution
      MATH

    3. Find the asymptotic behavior of MATH as MATH

      Recall
      MATH
      in a vector form and $X$ is a $T\times 1$ vector of ones. Therefore the IV (GMM) is
      MATH
      or
      MATH
      where $W_{T}$ is a $l\times l$ weight matrix. It is clearly that MATH, asymptotically, the ratio of quadratic forms in the two jointly normal random variables. Suppose the model is just-identified, $l=1$, then
      MATH
      It follows that by a CMT
      MATH
      which is a Cauchy random variable since the ratio of two normals is Cauchy. Suppose $l>1$. We consider the 2SLS:
      MATH
      Thus
      MATH

      MATH
      and
      MATH
      where
      MATH
      It is easy to show
      MATH
      where
      MATH
      Therefore
      MATH

    4. Assume $\Sigma _{Z}=I_{l}.$ What happens to the asymptotic distribution of MATH when MATH That is, let MATH after you have passed MATH

      From (2) we know that
      MATH
      as $T$ MATH Note
      MATH
      since
      MATH

      MATH
      This means
      MATH
      which is $0$ only if
      MATH
      The implication of the result is that
      MATH
      if MATH and then MATH sequentially.

This document created by Scientific WorkPlace 4.1.