Problem Set #8 Name:________________
PPA 723
Professor John McPeak
1) McDonalds
and Burger King are thinking of putting a franchise on Euclid.
The following table represents their net benefits of putting up a
restaurant.
If McDonalds builds, they will make
10,000 per day net profit if Burger King also builds, 30,000 per day if Burger
King does not build.
If Burger King builds, they will
make -5,000 per day net profit if McDonalds builds,
and 20,000 per day if McDonalds does not build.
If a firm does not build, it does
not make any net profit.
|
|
Burger King
|
|
Build
|
Don’t Build
|
|
McDonalds
|
Build
|
10 -5
|
30 0
|
|
Don’t Build
|
0 20
|
0 0
|
a) Describe the full set of best response
strategies for each firm.
b)
What is the predicted outcome (Nash equilibrium) if each plays their
best response strategy?
c)
Does this change if we give Burger King first mover status?
2) Market structure,
externalities, and taxation. The inverse
demand curve is given as p=100-q. The supply
curve is p=10+q.
- What
is the equilibrium price quantity pair if the market structure is
perfectly competitive?
- What
is the equilibrium price quantity pair if production of the good imposes
an externality defined by MCE= 0.5*q and the market structure
is perfectly competitive?
- What
Pigovian tax can be defined as a specific tax on producers in the
perfectly competitive market to arrive at the socially optimal price-
quantity pair?
- In
terms of economic efficiency, does it matter whether we place this tax on
consumers or producers? Why does it
matter or why does it not matter?
- What
is the equilibrium price quantity pair if the market structure is a
monopoly?
- Is
total welfare higher or lower with the monopoly result or the perfectly
competitive result in the presence of the production externality? Show using areas on a graph (and
calculate the size of these areas if you feel like extra practice).
3) Binghamton
has the “Broome County Regional” and Ithaca
has “Tompkins County Regional” airport.
Currently, Broome County gets $30,000 per day from running their own
airport, while Tompkins
County gets $50,000 per
day (these are net of all possible considerations). Under state guidance, a new regional airport
will be constructed if each municipality agrees to close their own
airport. If they do agree to close their
airport, they will evenly split the profit generate of the jointly managed “Southern-Tier Regional Airport”,
which is estimated to be $120,000 per day.
If Broome County
closes its airport, but Tompkins County does not, it is estimated that Broome County
will earn $0 per day, while Tompkins will earn $75,000 per day. If Tompkins county
closes its airport, but Broome county does not, Broome county is estimated to
earn $70,000 per day, and Tompkins county earns $0 per day. In normal form, this can be written as
follows.
|
|
Broome County
|
|
Tompkins
County
|
|
Close (BC)
|
Don’t Close (BC)
|
|
Close (TC)
|
$60, $60
|
$0, $70
|
|
Don’t Close (TC)
|
$75, $0
|
$50, $30
|
Payoffs are in
thousands of dollars.
a)
Describe the full
set of best response strategies for each county in turn.
b)
Will the regional airport be built if each firm plays
their own best response strategy?
4) Race to the bottom.
Maryland and Virginia are considering reducing welfare
benefits. Currently, Maryland
is spending 10 million per year on welfare programs, and Virginia is spending 20 million per
year. Given their close proximity and
high population density in the DC area, there is likely to be migration from
one state to another if one state cuts its benefits and the other does
not. In fact, research has indicated
that the following pattern is going to hold.
NOTE THESE ARE COSTS, NOT PAYOFFS, SO HIGH IS “BAD”, LOW IS “GOOD”
|
|
Virginia
|
|
Maryland
|
|
Reduce benefits
|
Maintain Current Benefits
|
|
Reduce benefits
|
7 16
|
6
23
|
|
Maintain Current Benefits
|
12 15
|
10
20
|
a. Define
the full set of best response strategies for each state.
b. What
is the outcome (the Nash Equilibrium) of this game.
c. Describe
in words the nature of the externality in this game?
d. Does
the outcome of this game resolve whether society is made better off by reducing
or maintaining current benefits? Why or
why not?