McPeak
Lecture 9
PPA 723
Competitive firms and markets.
Recall the conditions for a
perfectly competitive market.
1)
Goods are homogenous
2)
Large numbers of buyers and sellers/
freedom of entry and exit (price takers)
1)
Perfect information by both buyers
and sellers
2)
No transaction costs
Focus on the point that firms are
price takers in both output and input markets.
[That is to say, a firm can set a
selling price higher than the market price or offer to pay less for inputs than
the market price, but nobody will buy their product or sell them inputs if they
do so]
Profit maximization.
Profit = Revenue – costs.
Questions to be asked when
considering profit maximization:
1)
Should I produce at all?
2)
If so, how much should I produce?
To begin with, let us focus on the
case when we should produce an amount larger than zero, and then later consider
what would lead the firm to be better off producing zero.
I am going to also assume now that
we are in the long run, and we will introduce short run issues later.
I should produce to the point where
profit is maximized.
Show graph, with derivatives.
May not know the shape, but you
could think of this shape coming from experimentation.
At the peak of the curve, marginal
profit equals zero (increasing to the left of the maximum, decreasing to the
right of the maximum).
Since we know that
∏(Q)=R(Q)-C(Q), we can think of
the marginal representation of this as:
M∏=MR-MC, or 
We can elaborate on this expression
a bit since we know that ∏=R-C can also be expressed as
or
![]()
We can see that each additional unit
of Q (represented here by f(x) or Q) generates an additional revenue of size
p.
So in fact, MR = p.
The competitive firm will produce at
output level Q’ where MC(Q’)=p.
Since p = MR (and assuming p is
greater than or equal to AC(Q’) as we will see in a moment)
M∏=0 where MR=MC, and with
MC=p, we have p=MC.
Show graph.
If we want, we can think of profit
per unit in this case as equal to AR-AC, or price minus average cost. Then profit is Q’*profit per unit.
What if price is not greater than
average cost?
Long run production level
decision. Consider the point Q’ where
MC(Q’)=p. If this point is above AC,
then the firm stays in production. If
not, shut down.
Note that p is both MR and AR if
that helps.
Now consider the same type of
decision, but consider the example of a short run setting where fixed costs
exist.
∏(Q)=R(Q)-VC(Q)-FC.
Find Q’ where p=MC(Q’), noting that
this is where 
If at this point variable costs are
greater than revenue, then shut down. It
is already bad, producing makes it worse.
If variable costs are less than
revenue, then stay open and produce. You
will at least be eating into your losses, if not earning positive profit.
Show graph
If when I determine a quantity level
Q’ that sets MC(Q’)=p MC is below the AVC curve – note not the AC curve – then
I should not produce anything, set Q=0 and hope for better times in the future.
If when I choose the quantity level Q’
that sets MC(Q’)=p MC is above the AVC curve then I should produce Q’. I will minimizing loss / maximizing profit at
this point.
The competitive firm’s short run
supply curve is the marginal cost curve above the average variable cost. There is a discontinuity / jump / gap.
Show graph.
The market supply curve is the
horizontal sum of all the individual firms supply curves. Supply goes up as selling price increases due
to a mix of firms entering the market and firms already in the market supplying
more.
[show derivation]
Think about supply shifts when input
costs go up.
Show graph.
Supply slopes up due to the
diminishing marginal returns to an input in this short run context, which is
why the marginal cost curve is upward sloping.
The competitive firm’s long run
supply curve is the marginal cost curve above the average cost. There is still a discontinuity / jump / gap.
Show graph.
In the long run, there is no fixed
cost / variable cost distinction, so the diminishing marginal returns
explanation for the upward sloping curve is not going to hold.
The long run market supply curve is
flat (a horizontal line at the minimum point of AC / where MC and AC cross) if
and only if:
1)
Firms can freely enter and exit
2)
Firms are identical
3)
Input prices are constant
What would make entry limited? Production requires a limited resource. Government regulations. Entry is costly. This makes it slope up. See p. 243 for entry and exit rates.
What would make firms not be
identical? Location, production and
regulation environment, climate. This
makes it slope up.
What would make input prices vary
across firms? If there are only a few
firms who use the input (jet engine example) increased demand by competitors
should drive up the price of the input (compared to the receptionist
example). If there is something about
the scale of production allowing different technologies to be used (PC is
output, floppy disc is input example), then we can have decreasing input cost
as quantity expands.
Competitive firms earn zero economic
profit in the long run.
If firms are earning higher than
average return to capital (10.5% in the current text over the past five years
on page 255 though this is bound to come down given the recent turmoil), other
firms will move in, bringing down the price, bringing down the firm’s
profit.
If firms are earning less than the
average return to capital, some firms will drop out and reallocate capital to a
more attractive sector, bringing price up.
Even without entry and exit, we
still have zero economic profit however.
If there is a restriction, the market finds a way to extract the value
of the fixed input. Permit value. Capitalized present value.
If a firm does not maximize profit,
they will be losing money and be driven from business.
Summary:
A profit maximizing firm must then
choose the level of quantity it produces in a way that:
Uses inputs in a technologically
efficient fashion (production function).
Uses an input mix that is selected
to minimize the cost of producing Q (isoquant / isocost)
Compares the marginal cost of
producing at that level to the marginal revenue of producing at that level
(profit maximization)